All news

An energyPRO-based comparison of a premium and a triple tariff support scheme is presented

Anders N. Andersen had one of his articles published by Elsevier: An energyPRO-based comparison of a premium and a triple tariff support scheme is presented.

The comparison shows that, during a 20-year period, the cost to society is less than half when using the triple tariff compared to using the premium scheme for providing a certain capacity. While this capacity displaces the same amount of production from condensing mode power plants, the triple tariff promotes larger thermal energy storage capacity compared to the premium scheme, which is beneficial for district energy combined heat and power to fulfil its subsequent tasks in a renewable energy system.

Click here to read the article.